Nova Scotia judge rules that cancelled university football championship game should proceed

Adina Bresge, Canadian Press

A Nova Scotia judge has ruled that the Atlantic university football championship game will be played on Tuesday, giving Saint Mary’s University a chance to take on the Acadia Axemen in the Loney Bowl.

Saint Mary’s football players and fans shook hands in the Halifax courtroom after the decision was handed down on Sunday evening.

“(We’re) extremely excited to have the opportunity to play,” Huskies coach James Colzie said outside the courtroom. “We’ve been ready for the past for 48 hours.”

The teams were scheduled to face off on Saturday, but the Saint Mary’s Huskies were sidelined after the eligibility of one of the Halifax university’s players came under scrutiny.

Days before the matchup, the governing body for university athletics in the region, Atlantic University Sport, decided to cancel the game over the eligibility issue and awarded the title to Acadia.

Saint Mary’s went to court and lawyers for the parties spent the weekend arguing the matter before Nova Scotia Supreme Court associate justice Deborah Smith.

The players said they were eager to get back on the field on Tuesday in the game that will determine which Atlantic contender will take on Western at the Uteck Bowl next Saturday.

AUS executive director Phil Currie told reporters that the organization will respect the ruling, but said the organization stands by its decision to call off the game, and will continue to pursue the matter in court.

Acadia lawyer John Keith declined to comment on the decision, but during arguments, he repeatedly described the matter as a “mess.”

In handing down her decision, Smith said she was inclined to agree with Keith’s assessment.

“Football is a game. Some would suggest it is only a game. For a talented few, however, it can become a profession,” Smith told the court. “I hope that my ruling in this matter is clear. I want this game to take place by this Tuesday.”

Smith did not elaborate on the legal reasoning behind her decision, citing the case’s breakneck pace.

She said the game will take place on Acadia’s campus in Wolfville, N.S., as planned, provided that the school is willing and able to do so. If not, Saint Mary’s will host the game.

At the centre of the complex legal battle, which spans two provinces, is Huskies wide receiver Archelaus Jack’s eligibility to compete in a university football league due to allegations that he violated a league rule.

According to documents filed with the Ontario Superior Court, the national body governing Canadian university sports requires players who have been listed on a CFL team’s practice roster after Aug. 15 to wait one year before they can join a university football team.

Jack was released from the CFL’s Saskatchewan Roughriders practice squad in October, according to the documents.

Facebooktwitterredditmail

12 Comments on Nova Scotia judge rules that cancelled university football championship game should proceed

  1. So, with game now being played, is Archelaus Jack going to be eligible to play? The fact that whomever waited until St. Mary’s won the AUS semi final to question his eligibility also adds to this being a bit sketchy and further adds to the mess. St. Mary’s coaches certainly knew that he was a member of the Saskatchewan Roughrider’s practice squad, so, who is ultimately at fault here, the school, AUS or a combination of both? What ever happens on Tuesday, not sure it will help them when the victor gets to host Western on Saturday.

  2. So…the winner has 3 days to prep for Western? Good luck with that.

  3. His eligibilty was called into question October 23 and SMU been fighting this in court ever since

    • Was this public knowledge? Where did you get your information? This ahs not, to my knowledge been mentioned in any news story about this problem.

  4. Edith Sanford // November 13, 2017 at 7:15 am //

    Why was this court case processed so quickly while rapists walk free do to lengthy wait times?

  5. He was cut by the Riders in October of 2016 not 2017. Why wait until the playoffs to call in his eligibility, why was this not addressed when the said player played in the first 5 games of the season. According to eligibility rules he had to wait 1 year (Oct 11, 2017) to be eligible to play university football.

  6. Let’s flip it around. Why didn’t SMU confirm his eligibility before playing him for five games?

  7. Grant Corkum // November 14, 2017 at 11:10 am //

    SMU had it in writing from Usports that the player was eligible, that is why the judge ruled as she did. Currie is an idiot and planned this all along, why was he allowed to play against ST FX last weekend? Even waiting until late Thursday to announce it because he thought that would be too late. He should be fired from his position.

  8. Your facts are not correct this started Oct 23 during the regular season alternative facts. Thankfully they lost and hopefully they will be sanction more then a fine maybe suspension from next year playoffs. Karma’s a BITCH

Comments are closed.